Nudging New York: adaptive models and the limits of behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows and health inequalities

Ruggeri, Kai; Folke, Tomas; Benzerga, Amel; Verra, Sanne; Büttner, Clara; Steinbeck, Viktoria; Yee, Susan; Chaiyachati, Krisda

Missed healthcare appointments (no-shows) are costly and operationally inefficient for health systems. No-show rates are particularly high for vulnerable populations, even though these populations often require additional care. Few studies on no-show behavior or potential interventions exist specifically for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which care for over 24 million disadvantaged individuals in the United States. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of no-show behavior and to analyze the effects of a reminder intervention in urban FQHCs in order to design effective policy solutions to a protracted issue in healthcare.

This is a retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data from 11 facilities belonging to a New York City-based FQHC network between June 2017 to April 2018. This data includes 53,149 visits for 41,495 unique patients. Seven hierarchical generalized linear models and generalized additive models were used to predict no-shows, and multiple regression models evaluated the effectiveness of a reminder. All analyses were conducted in R.

The strongest predictor of no-show rates in FQHCs is whether or not patients are assigned to empaneled providers (z = − 91.45, p < 10− 10), followed by lead time for appointments (z = 23.87, p < 10− 10). These effects were fairly stable across facilities. The reminder had minimal effects on no-show rates overall (No show rate before: 41.6%, after: 42.1%). For individuals with appointments before and after the reminder, there was a small decrease in no-shows of 2%.

The limited effects of the reminder intervention suggest the need for more personalized behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows. We recommend that these begin with increasing the use of empaneled providers for preventive care appointments and reducing the lag time between setting the appointment and the actual date of the appointment, at least for individuals with a high rate of no-show. By complementing these with low-intensity, low-cost behavioral interventions, we would expect greater impacts for improved access to care, contributing to the well-being of vulnerable populations.

Geographic Areas


  • thumnail for 12913_2020_Article_5097.pdf 12913_2020_Article_5097.pdf application/pdf 513 KB Download File

Also Published In

BMC Health Services Research

More About This Work

Published Here
December 20, 2022


No-shows, Healthcare, Low-income populations, Economic inequality, Health inequality, FQHC, Personalized interventions, Behavioral interventions, Overbooking