Articles

The Bioethical Problems in Applying the Defense Production Act to Pharmaceuticals: A Case Study of Horizon’s Tepezza

Smith, Gabriella

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been calls for the President to invoke a Korean-war-era law, the Defense Production Act (“DPA”), to effectively nationalize the supply of critical medical supplies (e.g., N-95-grade masks, ventilators) and speed up vaccine production. The reasoning for employing the DPA is simple: it can immediately ramp up the industrial production of critical supplies and material resources and direct their distribution to areas of greatest need.[The Trump administration used the DPA 18 times to aid vaccine development. The Biden administration has followed suit, invoking the DPA in February. While the Defense Production Act has enabled a massive mobilization of crucial resources for vaccine development, it has also had negative, downstream effects, which raise ethical concerns surrounding resource allocation. Evaluating the effect of the DPA on Tepezza (teprotumumab-trbw; Horizon Therapeutics), a non-COVID-19 medication, demonstrates how the DPA is not adequately designed to address pharmaceutical manufacturing, and point to a potential need for further legislation.

Files

  • thumnail for Smith_2021_The Bioethical Problems in Applying the Defense Production Act to.pdf Smith_2021_The Bioethical Problems in Applying the Defense Production Act to.pdf application/pdf 150 KB Download File

Also Published In

Title
Voices in Bioethics
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v7i.8678

More About This Work

Published Here
August 29, 2022

Notes

Defense Production Act, Bioethics, Resource Allocation, Tepezza, COVID-19, Vaccine Development