Reports

Structural Barriers and Power Dynamics in UNCITRAL WGIII: Upholding the Status Quo?

Mehranvar, Ladan; Di Salvatore, Lea

This paper critically examines whether the UNCITRAL Working Group III reform process in investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) is procedurally inclusive and meaningfully accessible to developing countries, which are disproportionately subject to ISDS claims. Drawing on attendance and participation patterns across five negotiating sessions between September 2022 and January 2024, the analysis reveals persistent disparities in engagement among States. While high-income countries continue to dominate the process, developing countries have nonetheless made strategic interventions and secured limited gains, despite facing significant obstacles. Their ability to participate meaningfully, however, is constrained by deeper systemic disadvantages – including resource disparities, language and expertise gaps, delegation instability, and limited access to regional preparatory processes. Rather than establishing causality, the paper traces how these conditions shape the terrain of participation, offering insight into the broader dynamics and limitations of multilateral investment treaty reform.

Keywords; investment treaties, ISDS. power asymmetry, UNCITRAL WGIII reform process

Files

  • thumbnail for CCSI-Mehranvar-DiSalvatore-Structural-Barriers (1).pdf CCSI-Mehranvar-DiSalvatore-Structural-Barriers (1).pdf application/pdf 719 KB Download File

More About This Work

Academic Units
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Published Here
April 22, 2026