Theses Doctoral

Bandits, Knapsacks, and Active Learning: Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Sequential Decision-Making

Aznag, Abdellah

The quality of a decision is inextricably linked to the quality of the data that informs it. Yet in many operational settings---from revenue management to clinical trials---data collection is subject to real costs and constraints, making 𝘩𝘰𝘸 to collect data a first-order design problem. This thesis develops principled policies for sequential data collection in complex systems, organized around two themes: π˜₯𝘦𝘀π˜ͺ𝘴π˜ͺ𝘰𝘯-𝘒𝘸𝘒𝘳𝘦 collection, where data acquisition is coupled to a downstream optimization objective, and 𝘳𝘦𝘭π˜ͺ𝘒𝘣π˜ͺ𝘭π˜ͺ𝘡𝘺-𝘒𝘸𝘒𝘳𝘦 collection, where the goal is to build estimates that are uniformly reliable across a heterogeneous environment.

In the first part, we study decision-aware collection in the context of dynamic assortment optimization under the Multinomial Logit choice model with finite inventory. We propose MNLwK-UCB, an algorithm that achieves 𝑂̃(𝑁 + βˆšπ‘π‘‡) regret uniformly across all inventory regimes, matching the infinite-inventory benchmark and improving upon all prior bounds. The analysis introduces a modular regret decomposition that isolates the cost of learning from the cost of inventory mismanagement.

In the second part, we turn to reliability-aware collection for multi-group mean estimation. We develop Variance-UCB and a unified width-based regret analysis showing that the true bottleneck for data collection is not distributional complexity but the relative knowledge gap between the system's structure and the decision-maker's prior knowledge. Our bounds eliminate the 𝜎⁻¹/min dependence present in all prior work, resolving an open question of Carpentier et al. 2011).

In the third part, we establish the fundamental limits of the reliability-aware collection problem through a local minimax framework. We introduce the Variance Local Curvature, an information-geometric functional that quantifies the intrinsic difficulty of learning each group's variance within a given hypothesis class, and we identify the precise gap between achievable and optimal performance.

Files

  • thumbnail for gsas-dissertations-000658.pdf gsas-dissertations-000658.pdf application/pdf 944 KB Download File

More About This Work

Academic Units
Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
Thesis Advisors
Cummings, Rachel
Degree
Ph.D., Columbia University
Published Here
September 23, 2026

Notes

Mathematics, Operations Research, Active Learning, Multi-armed bandits

Additional thesis advisor(s): Elmachtoub, Adam Nabil