Academic Commons

Articles

Mixed-methods evaluation of mental healthcare integration into tuberculosis and maternal-child healthcare services of four South African districts

Lovero, Kathryn L.; Lammie, Samantha L.; van Zyl, André; Paul, Sharon N.; Ngwepe, Phuti; Mootz, Jennifer J.; Carlson, Catherine; Sweetland, Annika C.; Shelton, Rachel C.; Wainberg, Milton L.; Medina-Marino, Andrew

Background
The South African National Mental Health Policy Framework and Strategic Plan 2013–2020 was adopted to address the country’s substantial burden and inadequate treatment of mental illness. It outlines measures toward the goal of full integration of mental health services into primary care by 2020. To evaluate progress and challenges in implementation, we conducted a mixed-methods assessment of mental health service provision in tuberculosis and maternal-child healthcare services of four districts in South Africa.

Methods
Forty clinics (ten per district) were purposively selected to represent both urban and rural locations. District-level program managers (DPMs) for mental health, tuberculosis, and maternal-child healthcare were qualitatively interviewed about district policy and procedures for management of mental illness and challenges in integrating mental health services into primary care. Clinic nurses and mental health practitioners (MHPs) completed a quantitative questionnaire to assess their engagement with stepped care for patients with mental illness. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently and compared to triangulate progress in implementation of integrated services.

Results
A total of 59 nurses and 17 MHPs completed questionnaires, and nine DPMs were interviewed (total n = 85). DPMs indicated that nurses should screen for mental illness at every patient visit, although only 43 (73%) nurses reported conducting universal screening and 26 (44%) reported using a specific screening tool. For patients who screen positive for mental illness, DPMs described a stepped-care approach in which MHPs diagnose patients and then treat or refer them to specialized care. However, only 7 (41%) MHPs indicated that they diagnose mental illness and 14 (82%) offer any treatment for mental illness. Addressing challenges to current integration efforts, DPMs highlighted 1) insufficient funding and material resources, 2) poor coordination at the district administrative level, and 3) low mental health awareness in district administration and the general population.

Conclusions
Though some progress has been made toward integration of mental health services into primary care settings, there is a substantial lack of training and clarity of roles for nurses and MHPs. To enhance implementation, increased efforts must be directed toward improving district-level administrative coordination, mental health awareness, and financial and material resources.

Geographic Areas

Files

  • thumnail for 12913_2019_Article_3912.pdf 12913_2019_Article_3912.pdf application/pdf 630 KB Download File

Also Published In

Title
BMC Health Services Research
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3912-9

More About This Work

Academic Units
Psychiatry
Sociomedical Sciences
Published Here
April 3, 2019

Notes

Mental health, Mental disorders, Primary care, Healthcare integration, Health systems, South Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, Mixed-methods, Implementation

Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.