2019 Reports
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
The rapid increase of third-party funding (TPF) in investor-state dispute-settlement (ISDS) raises concerns about effects TPF may have on the stability, fairness and legitimacy of the investment treaty regime. States and other stakeholders should critically assess the risks posed by TPF in its current form, and regulate, if not ban, TPF in investment disputes.
Subjects
Files
Downloadable resources are currently unavailable for this item.
More About This Work
- Academic Units
- Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
- Publisher
- Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
- Series
- Columbia FDI Perspectives, 253
- Published Here
- March 5, 2020