Academic Commons

Articles

Factors influencing referrals for ultrasound-diagnosed complications during prenatal care in five low and middle income countries

Franklin, Holly L.; Mirza, Waseem; Swanson, David L.; Newman, Jamie E.; Goldenberg, Robert L.; Muyodi, David; Figueroa, Lester; Nathan, Robert O.; Swanson, Jonathan O.; Goldsmith, Nicole; Kanaiza, Nancy; Naqvi, Farnaz; Pineda, Irma S.; López-Gomez, Walter; Hamsumonde, Dorothy; Bolamba, Victor L.; Fogleman, Elizabeth V.; Saleem, Sarah; Esamai, Fabian; Liechty, Edward A.; Garces, Ana L.; Krebs, Nancy F.; Michael Hambidge, K.; Chomba, Elwyn; Mwenechanya, Musaku; Carlo, Waldemar A.; Tshefu, Antoinette; Lokangaka, Adrien; Bose, Carl L.; Koso-Thomas, Marion; Miodovnik, Menachem; McClure, Elizabeth M.

Background
Ultrasound during antenatal care (ANC) is proposed as a strategy for increasing hospital deliveries for complicated pregnancies and improving maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. The First Look study was a cluster-randomized trial conducted in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan and Zambia to evaluate the impact of ANC-ultrasound on these outcomes. An additional survey was conducted to identify factors influencing women with complicated pregnancies to attend referrals for additional care.

Methods
Women who received referral due to ANC ultrasound findings participated in structured interviews to characterize their experiences. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics were used to examine differences between women who attended the referral and women who did not. Sonographers’ exam findings were compared to referred women’s recall.

Results
Among 700 referred women, 510 (71%) attended the referral. Among referred women, 97% received a referral card to present at the hospital, 91% were told where to go in the hospital, and 64% were told that the hospital was expecting them. The referred women who were told who to see at the hospital (88% vs 66%), where to go (94% vs 82%), or what should happen, were more likely to attend their referral (68% vs 56%). Barriers to attending referrals were cost, transportation, and distance. Barriers after reaching the hospital were substantial. These included not connecting with an appropriate provider, not knowing where to go, and being told to return later. These barriers at the hospital often led to an unsuccessful referral.

Conclusions
Our study found that ultrasound screening at ANC alone does not adequately address barriers to referrals. Better communication between the sonographer and the patient increases the likelihood of a completed referral. These types of communication include describing the ultrasound findings, including the reason for the referral, to the mother and staff; providing a referral card; describing where to go in the hospital; and explaining the procedures at the hospital. Thus, there are three levels of communication that need to be addressed to increase completion of appropriate referrals-communication between the sonographer and the woman, the sonographer and the clinic staff, and the sonographer and the hospital.

Trial registration: NCT01990625.

Files

  • thumnail for 12978_2018_Article_647.pdf 12978_2018_Article_647.pdf application/pdf 580 KB Download File

Also Published In

Title
Reproductive Health
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0647-8

More About This Work

Academic Units
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published Here
March 27, 2019

Notes

Ultrasound, Antenatal care, Low-middle income countries, Pregnancy complication, Hospital referral, Delivery

Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.