Academic Commons

Theses Doctoral

Neural Dynamics and the Geometry of Population Activity

Russo, Abigail Anita

A growing body of research indicates that much of the brain’s computation is invisible from the activity of individual neurons, but instead instantiated via population-level dynamics. According to this ‘dynamical systems hypothesis’, population-level neural activity evolves according to underlying dynamics that are shaped by network connectivity. While these dynamics are not directly observable in empirical data, they can be inferred by studying the structure of population trajectories. Quantification of this structure, the ‘trajectory geometry’, can then guide thinking on the underlying computation. Alternatively, modeling neural populations as dynamical systems can predict trajectory geometries appropriate for particular tasks. This approach of characterizing and interpreting trajectory geometry is providing new insights in many cortical areas, including regions involved in motor control and areas that mediate cognitive processes such as decision-making. In this thesis, I advance the characterization of population structure by introducing hypothesis-guided metrics for the quantification of trajectory geometry. These metrics, trajectory tangling in primary motor cortex and trajectory divergence in the Supplementary Motor Area, abstract away from task-specific solutions and toward underlying computations and network constraints that drive trajectory geometry.
Primate motor cortex (M1) projects to spinal interneurons and motoneurons, suggesting that motor cortex activity may be dominated by muscle-like commands. Observations during reaching lend support to this view, but evidence remains ambiguous and much debated. To provide a different perspective, we employed a novel behavioral paradigm that facilitates comparison between time-evolving neural and muscle activity. We found that single motor cortex neurons displayed many muscle-like properties, but the structure of population activity was not muscle-like. Unlike muscle activity, neural activity was structured to avoid ‘trajectory tangling’: moments where similar activity patterns led to dissimilar future patterns. Avoidance of trajectory tangling was present across tasks and species. Network models revealed a potential reason for this consistent feature: low trajectory tangling confers noise robustness. We were able to predict motor cortex activity from muscle activity by leveraging the hypothesis that muscle-like commands are embedded in additional structure that yields low trajectory tangling.
The Supplementary Motor Area (SMA) has been implicated in many higher-order aspects of motor control. Previous studies have demonstrated that SMA might track motor context. We propose that this computation necessitates that neural activity avoids ‘trajectory divergence’: moments where two similar neural states become dissimilar in the future. Indeed, we found that population activity in SMA, but not in M1, reliably avoided trajectory divergence, resulting in fundamentally different geometries: cyclical in M1 and helix-like in SMA. Analogous structure emerged in artificial networks trained without versus with context-related inputs. These findings reveal that the geometries of population activity in SMA and M1 are fundamentally different, with direct implications regarding what computations can be performed by each area.
The characterization and statistical analysis of trajectory geometry promises to advance our understanding of neural network function by providing interpretable, cohesive explanations for observed population structure. Commonality between individuals and networks can be uncovered and more generic, task-invariant, fundamental aspects of neural response can be explored.

Files

  • thumnail for Russo_columbia_0054D_15310.pdf Russo_columbia_0054D_15310.pdf application/pdf 3.65 MB Download File

More About This Work

Academic Units
Neurobiology and Behavior
Thesis Advisors
Churchland, Mark M.
Degree
Ph.D., Columbia University
Published Here
May 10, 2019
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.