Free, prior and informed consent: Addressing political realities to improve impact

Mebratu-Tsegaye, Tehtena; Kazemi, Leila

Indigenous and Tribal peoples’ right to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) has transformative potential. Yet, there is a considerable gap between the theory and what happens in practice. Global actors supporting recognition of FPIC and effective prior consultation processes usually focus on normative standards and best practices. They concentrate much less on addressing the political challenges and opportunities that shape how these processes unfold. With funding from the Ford Foundation, we looked at the politics of FPIC in Latin America, analyzing how the power and interests of the key players–across governments, companies and indigenous peoples–can determine the fate of FPIC and consultation processes in practice. This research focused on Brazil, Colombia, and Peru, and provides practical options to address key political challenges in hopes of improving outcomes for indigenous and tribal peoples. In addition, we are partnering with Dejusticia and the multi-stakeholder Dialogue Group for Mining in Colombia (GDIAM) to explore further the political impediments to meaningful mining consultation processes in that country, and to field ideas for navigating these more effectively in the future.

Geographic Areas


  • thumnail for 2-Eng-Report-Free-prior-and-informed-consent-Addressing-political-realities-to-improve-impact.pdf 2-Eng-Report-Free-prior-and-informed-consent-Addressing-political-realities-to-improve-impact.pdf application/pdf 3.5 MB Download File

More About This Work

Academic Units
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
Center for Sustainable Development, Earth Institute, Columbia University
Published Here
November 9, 2020