Academic Commons

Articles

Legal Reform: China’s Law-Stability Paradox

Liebman, Benjamin L.

In the 1980s and 1990s, China devoted extensive resources to constructing a legal system, in part in the belief that legal institutions would enhance both stability and regime legitimacy. Why, then, did China’s leadership retreat from using law when faced with perceived increases in protests, citizen complaints, and social discontent in the 2000s? This law-stability paradox suggests that party-state leaders do not trust legal institutions to play primary roles in addressing many of the most complex issues resulting from China’s rapid social transformation. This signifies a retreat not only from legal reform, but also from the rule-based model of authoritarian governance that has contributed much to the resilience of the Chinese system. The law-stability paradox also highlights the diffculties facing efforts by China’s new leadership to reinvigorate legal reform.

Geographic Areas

Files

  • thumnail for Legal_Reform_China_s_Law_Stability_Paradox_PDF_plus.pdf Legal_Reform_China_s_Law_Stability_Paradox_PDF_plus.pdf application/pdf 135 KB Download File

Also Published In

More About This Work

Academic Units
Law
Published Here
November 25, 2015
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.