Academic Commons

Articles

The Inter-rater Variability of Clinical Assessment in Post-anoxic Myoclonus

van Zijl, Jonathan C.; Beudel, Martijn; Elting, Jan-Willem J.; de Jong, Bauke M.; van der Naalt, Joukje; van den Bergh, Walter M.; Rossetti, Andrea O.; Tijssen, Marina A. J.; Horn, Janneke

Background: Acute post-anoxic myoclonus (PAM) can be divided into an unfavorable (generalized/subcortical) and more favorable ((multi)focal/cortical) outcome group that could support prognostication in post-anoxic encephalopathy; however, the inter-rater variability of clinically assessing these PAM subtypes is unknown.

Methods: We prospectively examined PAM patients using a standardized video protocol. Videos were rated by three neurologists who classified PAM phenotype (generalized/(multi)focal), stimulus sensitivity, localization (proximal/distal/both), and severity (Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) and Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS)).

Results: Poor inter-rater agreement was found for phenotype and stimulus sensitivity (κ = –0.05), moderate agreement for localization (κ = 0.46). Substantial agreement was obtained for the CGI-S (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.64) and almost perfect agreement for the UMRS (ICC = 0.82).

Discussion: Clinical assessment of PAM is not reproducible between physicians, and should therefore not be used for prognostication. PAM severity measured by the UMRS appears to be reliable; however, the relation between PAM severity and outcome is unknown.

Files

Also Published In

Title
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7916/D81R6XBV

More About This Work

Academic Units
Center for Parkinson's Disease and Other Movement Disorders
Published Here
November 28, 2017