Academic Commons

Articles

Confounding

Stellman, Steven D.

The magnitude of confounding is examined in nine case studies of two "weak" relationships: between artificial sweeteners and bladder cancer, and between oral contraceptives and cervical dysplasia. Confounding had little or no influence on the results of any published study. The responsible epidemiologist must always consider the possibility of confounding, no less when associations are weak than when they are strong. Identification of potentially confounding variables is an integral part of good epidemiologic practice. Rarely, however, does confounding itself, especially from unidentified sources, live up to its reputation for introducing seriously spurious associations. An investigator is more likely to be led astray by undetected biases than by pure confounding.

Files

  • thumnail for Stellman_1987_Confounding_PrevMed.pdf Stellman_1987_Confounding_PrevMed.pdf application/pdf 1.21 MB Download File

Also Published In

Title
Preventive Medicine

More About This Work

Academic Units
Epidemiology
Published Here
October 6, 2014
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.