Looking Inside the Black Box of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Policy Instruments, Outcomes, Obstacles, and Unintended Impacts

Dougherty, Kevin J.; Jones, Sosanya M.; Lahr, Hana Elizabeth; Natow, Rebecca Spiro; Pheatt, Lara Elaine; Reddy, Vikash T.

For several decades, policymakers have been concerned about increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of postsecondary institutions. In recent years, performance funding—which directly connects state funding to an institution’s performance on indicators such as student persistence, credit accrual, and college completion—has become a particularly attractive way of pursuing better college outcomes. But even as states have made an enormous investment in performance funding, troubling questions have been raised about whether performance funding has the effects intended and whether it also produces substantial negative side effects in the form of restrictions in access for underrepresented students and weakening of academic standards. This paper addresses these troubling questions by drawing on data richer than heretofore available. In addition to drawing on the existing body of research on performance funding, it reports data from a study of the implementation of performance funding in three leading states (Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee) and its impacts on three universities and three community colleges in each state.

Geographic Areas


  • thumnail for Dougherty_et_al_-_Looking_Inside_the_Black_Box_of_PF_2016.pdf Dougherty_et_al_-_Looking_Inside_the_Black_Box_of_PF_2016.pdf application/pdf 629 KB Download File

Also Published In

Higher Education Effectiveness

More About This Work

Academic Units
Community College Research Center
Published Here
December 6, 2016


This article is also available from the Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences at: