Academic Commons

Articles

Concrete Fictions and Hegemonic Methodologies: Doing Policy Research in Government

McAllister, William

Faced with having to justify programs to offices of management and budget, government agencies generate numbers which describe expected program impacts. But the assumptions or data on which these numbers are based are frequently suspect, as is the utility of relying on counts and modeling techniques for evaluating the achievement of program aims. The result is that agencies often create "concrete fictions," hard numbers with feet of (soft) clay. Offices of management and budget are able to make their methodology "hegemonic" because agencies usually have to secure their approval to get funding. But imposing this methodology encourages agencies to use research staffs more to defend against the budget office than to help create effective programs, creates differences between the expectations of government and the public, and fosters the overrepresentation of particular interests.

Files

Also Published In

Title
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-19-1-91

More About This Work

Academic Units
Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy
Published Here
July 23, 2012
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.