2003 Reports
Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income
In a series of papers, my colleagues and I have demonstrated that levels of per capita income, economic growth, and other economic and demographic dimensions are strongly correlated with geographical and ecological variables such as climate zone, disease ecology, and distance from the coast. Three recent papers purport to show that the role of geography in explaining cross-country patterns of income per capita operates predominantly or exclusively through the choice of institutions, with little direct effect of geography on income after controlling for the quality institutions. This note shows that malaria transmission, which is strongly affected by ecological conditions, directly affects the level of per capita income after controlling for the quality of institutions.
Subjects
Files
- w9490.pdf application/pdf 335 KB Download File
More About This Work
- Academic Units
- Earth Institute
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Series
- NBER Working Paper, 9490
- Published Here
- September 29, 2009
Related Items
- Version of:
- Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income
- Supplemented by:
- Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income
- Supplemented by:
- Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income
- Supplemented by:
- Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income