Academic Commons

Articles

The First Principles of Standing: Privilege, System Justification, and the Predictable Incoherence of Article III

Sundquist, Christian B.

This Article examines the indeterminacy of standing doctrine by deconstructing recent desegregation, affirmative action, and racial profiling cases. This examination is an attempt to uncover the often unstated meta-principles that guide standing jurisprudence. The Article contends that the inherent indeterminacy of standing law can be understood as reflecting an unstated desire to protect racial and class privilege, which is accomplished through the dogma of individualism, equal opportunity (liberty), and "white innocence." Relying on insights from System Justification Theory, a burgeoning field of social psychology, the Article argues that the seemingly incoherent results in racial standing cases can be understood as unconscious attempts to preserve the status quo. The Article proposes moving "beyond the transcendental nonsense" of standing doctrine and its inevitable replication of economic and racial privilege by completely eliminating all standing limitations to the access of justice.

Files

  • thumnail for Sundquist_First_Principles_of_Standing_January_20111.pdf Sundquist_First_Principles_of_Standing_January_20111.pdf application/pdf 560 KB Download File

Also Published In

Title
Columbia Journal of Race and Law

More About This Work

Academic Units
Law
Published Here
October 20, 2012
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.