2006 Articles
Lulac on Partisan Gerrymandering: Some Clarity, More Uncertainty
LULAC’s treatment of the partisan gerrymandering question, thus, may be as significant for the continuing divisions and uncertainties it reveals as for the result it achieved. A majority of the Court is willing to grapple with the gerrymandering issue but that majority is internally torn over what makes partisan gerrymandering a constitutional problem and when judicial intervention is appropriate. The Court’s difficulty is understandable. Gerrymandering is a challenge to democratic self-government, but judicial intervention requires a judicially manageable theory of democracy compatible with the Constitution and our political institutions. It remains to be seen whether the Court can agree upon such a theory. Vieth and LULAC suggest that the outlook is not promising.
Geographic Areas
Subjects
Files
- Lulac_on_Partisan_Gerrymandering_Some_Clarity_More_Uncertainty.pdf application/pdf 103 KB Download File
Also Published In
- Title
- Michigan Law Review
More About This Work
- Academic Units
- Law
- Published Here
- January 3, 2017