Academic Commons

Lulac on Partisan Gerrymandering: Some Clarity, More Uncertainty

Briffault, Richard

LULAC’s treatment of the partisan gerrymandering question, thus, may be as significant for the continuing divisions and uncertainties it reveals as for the result it achieved. A majority of the Court is willing to grapple with the gerrymandering issue but that majority is internally torn over what makes partisan gerrymandering a constitutional problem and when judicial intervention is appropriate. The Court’s difficulty is understandable. Gerrymandering is a challenge to democratic self-government, but judicial intervention requires a judicially manageable theory of democracy compatible with the Constitution and our political institutions. It remains to be seen whether the Court can agree upon such a theory. Vieth and LULAC suggest that the outlook is not promising.

Geographic Areas

Files

  • thumnail for Lulac_on_Partisan_Gerrymandering_Some_Clarity_More_Uncertainty.pdf Lulac_on_Partisan_Gerrymandering_Some_Clarity_More_Uncertainty.pdf application/pdf 103 KB Download File

Also Published In

Title
Michigan Law Review

More About This Work

Academic Units
Law
Published Here
January 3, 2017
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.