Academic Commons

Reports

Is the party-appointed arbitrator a "pernicious institution"? A reply to Professor Hans Smit

Sacerdoti, Giorgio

Some readers of the Columbia FDI Perspective No. 33 of December 14, 2010 may have been surprised to read Hans Smit's contribution against party-appointed arbitrators. The opening of his Perspective could not be expressed in more sweeping terms: "In my judgment, party-appointed arbitrators should be banned unless their role as advocates for the party that appointed them is fully disclosed and accepted. Until this is done, arbitration can never meet its aspiration of providing dispassionate adjudication . . . ."

Subjects

Files

  • thumnail for columbia_FDI_perspectives_035.pdf columbia_FDI_perspectives_035.pdf application/pdf 77.3 KB Download File

More About This Work

Academic Units
Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment
Publisher
Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment
Series
Columbia FDI Perspectives, 35
Published Here
June 23, 2011
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.