Academic Commons

Articles

Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States: a cross-sectional study

Gershon, Robyn R.; Orr, Mark; Zhi, Qi; Merrill, Jacqueline A.; Chen, Daniel; Riley, Halley; Sherman, Martin

In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness. Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness. A large proportion (42%) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72%) expected federal assistance. The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.

Files

  • thumnail for 1471-2458-14-1275-S1.pdf 1471-2458-14-1275-S1.pdf binary/octet-stream 412 KB Download File
  • thumnail for 1471-2458-14-1275-S2.docx 1471-2458-14-1275-S2.docx binary/octet-stream 20.6 KB Download File
  • thumnail for sword-552778388447613591307.zip sword-552778388447613591307.zip binary/octet-stream 1.13 MB Download File

Also Published In

Title
BMC Public Health
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1275

More About This Work

Academic Units
Nursing
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published Here
January 26, 2015
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.