2001 Articles
Vagueness in Geography
Some have argued that the vagueness exhibited by geographic names and descriptions such as ''Albuquerque,'' ''the Outback,'' or ''Mount Everest'' is ultimately ontological: these terms are vague because they refer to vague objects , objects with fuzzy boundaries. I take the opposite stand and hold the view that geographic vagueness is exclusively semantic, or conceptual at large. There is no such thing as a vague mountain. Rather, there are many things where we conceive a mountain to be, each with its precise boundary, and when we say ''Everest'' we are just being vague as to which thing we are referring to. This paper defends this view against some plausible objections.
Subjects
Files
- P_G_2001.pdf application/pdf 64.9 KB Download File
Also Published In
- Title
- Philosophy and Geography
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770124125
More About This Work
- Academic Units
- Philosophy
- Published Here
- November 25, 2014