Academic Commons

Articles

Disqualifications of Decisional Officials in Rulemaking

Strauss, Peter

What constraints on impartiality govern agency officials responsible for decisions in proceedings other than on-the-record adjudications'? The past few years have witnessed the emergence of a striking body of professional debate, statute, and case law concerning ethics in government and the control of "special interest" influence on governmental decisions. Higher standards for conflict of interest, expanded constraints on ex parte communications, and enlarged concerns about separation of functions within the agencies are parts of this development. Another strand, tangled with the others yet doctrinally distinct, concerns the disqualification of responsible government officials for their prior contacts with or expressions of opinion on issues to be brought before them for decision. In the familiar setting of on-the-record adjudication, near-judicial impartiality is a conceded requisite. Today, arguments for disqualification are being pressed with vigor, and responded to, well beyond this setting. This paper is addressed to these developments.

Files

  • thumnail for Disqualifications_of_Decisional_Officials_in_Rulemaking.pdf Disqualifications_of_Decisional_Officials_in_Rulemaking.pdf application/pdf 7.32 MB Download File

Also Published In

Title
Columbia Law Review
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2307/1122093

More About This Work

Academic Units
Law
Publisher
Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.
Published Here
May 5, 2016
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.