Academic Commons

Reproducing Development’s Trusteeship and Discursive Power

Lie, Jon Harald Sande

Development aid is characterised by an inherently asymmetry between donor and recipient institution. Despite regular aid reforms and bold ambitions to change this relation, the asymmetry seems to persist. Inspired by post-development theory, and drawing on both a review of development theory and ethnographic fieldwork within the World Bank, this article argues that the lopsided aid-relations are continuously being reproduced through the formation of development expert knowledge within authoritative donor communities. Here, contemporary knowledge/power formations shape and are shaped by historically embedded structures and epistemic communities that benefit the donor's need for legible and operational knowledge, being knowledge of a particular kind. Hence, top-down approaches to development planning are reproduced at the cost of participatory, bottom-up ones, as per the official order and rhetoric.

Files

Also Published In

Title
Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development

More About This Work

Academic Units
Earth Institute
Published Here
February 12, 2016
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.