1998 Reports
Antitrust policy and Japan's international steel trade
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the Antimonopoly Law in 1992 pushed Japanese firms to compete more? A basic assumption behind our understanding of market systems is that firms compete over price to attract customers, spurring them to lower productions costs, improve productivity, and provide greater benefits to society. Assumptions about price competition also underlie international trade agreements. Parties to such agreements presume that if governments lower their barriers to trade, that the intrinsic competitiveness of markets will mean that price-competitive foreign firms will be able to sell their goods.
Geographic Areas
Files
- WP_159.pdf application/pdf 1.7 MB Download File
More About This Work
- Academic Units
- Center on Japanese Economy and Business
- Publisher
- Center on Japanese Economy and Business, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University
- Series
- Center on Japanese Economy and Business Working Papers, 159
- Published Here
- February 10, 2011