Academic Commons

Articles

Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion

Baldassarri, Delia; Gelman, Andrew E.

Public opinion polarization is here conceived as a process of alignment along multiple lines of potential disagreement and measured as growing constraint in individuals' preferences. Using NES data from 1972 to 2004, the authors model trends in issue partisanship--the correlation of issue attitudes with party identification--and issue alignment--the correlation between pairs of issues--and find a substantive increase in issue partisanship, but little evidence of issue alignment. The findings suggest that opinion changes correspond more to a resorting of party labels among voters than to greater constraint on issue attitudes: since parties are more polarized, they are now better at sorting individuals along ideological lines. Levels of constraint vary across population subgroups: strong partisans and wealthier and politically sophisticated voters have grown more coherent in their beliefs. The authors discuss the consequences of partisan realignment and group sorting on the political process and potential deviations from the classic pluralistic account of American politics.

Files

  • thumnail for PartisansWithoutConstraint_final.pdf PartisansWithoutConstraint_final.pdf application/pdf 843 KB Download File

More Information

Published In
American Journal of Sociology
Publisher DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/590649
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
408 - 446
Academic Units
Statistics
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.