Academic Commons

Articles

Variability in objective and subjective measures affects baseline values in studies of patients with COPD

Anderson, Wayne; Ha, Jae Wook; Couper, David J.; O’Neal, Wanda K.; Barr, R. Graham; Bleecker, Eugene R.; Carretta, Elizabeth E.; Cooper, Christopher B.; Doerschuk, Claire M.; Drummond, M. Bradley; Han, MeiLan K.; Hansel, Nadia N.; Kim, Victor; Kleerup, Eric C.; Martinez, Fernando J.; Rennard, Stephen I.; Tashkin, Donald; Woodruff, Prescott G.; Paine III, Robert; Curtis, Jeffrey L.; Kanner, Richard E.; SPIROMICS Research Group

Rationale:
Understanding the reliability and repeatability of clinical measurements used in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of disease progression is of critical importance across all disciplines of clinical practice and in clinical trials to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Objectives:
Our goal is to understand normal variability for assessing true changes in health status and to more accurately utilize this data to differentiate disease characteristics and outcomes.

Methods:
Our study is the first study designed entirely to establish the repeatability of a large number of instruments utilized for the clinical assessment of COPD in the same subjects over the same period. We utilized SPIROMICS participants (n = 98) that returned to their clinical center within 6 weeks of their baseline visit to repeat complete baseline assessments. Demographics, spirometry, questionnaires, complete blood cell counts (CBC), medical history, and emphysema status by computerized tomography (CT) imaging were obtained.

Results:
Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were highly repeatable (ICC’s >0.9) but the 6 minute walk (6MW) was less so (ICC = 0.79). Among questionnaires, the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was most repeatable. Self-reported clinical features, such as exacerbation history, and features of chronic bronchitis, often produced kappa values <0.6. Reported age at starting smoking and average number of cigarettes smoked were modestly repeatable (kappa = 0.76 and 0.79). Complete blood counts (CBC) variables produced intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values between 0.6 and 0.8.

Conclusions:
PFTs were highly repeatable, while subjective measures and subject recall were more variable. Analyses using features with poor repeatability could lead to misclassification and outcome errors. Hence, care should be taken when interpreting change in clinical features based on measures with low repeatability. Efforts to improve repeatability of key clinical features such as exacerbation history and chronic bronchitis are warranted.

Files

Also Published In

More About This Work

Academic Units
Medicine
Published Here
February 6, 2018
Academic Commons provides global access to research and scholarship produced at Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary. Academic Commons is managed by the Columbia University Libraries.