Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era

Jason E. Smerdon; Benjamin I. Cook; Justin S. Mankin; Deepti Singh; Nathan J. Steiger; Laia Andreu Hayles; Seung Hun Baek; Brendan M. Buckley; Edward R. Cook; Rosanne Dorothy D’Arrigo; Yochanan Kushnir; Caroline Wogan Leland; Mukund Palat Rao; Jacob S. Scheff; Richard Seager; A. Park Williams; PAGES Hydro2k Consortium

Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era
Smerdon, Jason E.
Cook, Benjamin I.
Mankin, Justin S.
Singh, Deepti
Steiger, Nathan J.
Andreu Hayles, Laia
Baek, Seung Hun
Buckley, Brendan M.
Cook, Edward R.
D’Arrigo, Rosanne Dorothy
Kushnir, Yochanan
Leland, Caroline Wogan
Rao, Mukund Palat
Scheff, Jacob S.
Seager, Richard
Williams, A. Park
PAGES Hydro2k Consortium
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Earth and Environmental Sciences
Persistent URL:
Book/Journal Title:
Climate of the Past
Water availability is fundamental to societies and ecosystems, but our understanding of variations in hydroclimate (including extreme events, flooding, and decadal periods of drought) is limited because of a paucity of modern instrumental observations that are distributed unevenly across the globe and only span parts of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such data coverage is insufficient for characterizing hydroclimate and its associated dynamics because of its multidecadal to centennial variability and highly regionalized spatial signature. High-resolution (seasonal to decadal) hydroclimatic proxies that span all or parts of the Common Era (CE) and paleoclimate simulations from climate models are therefore important tools for augmenting our understanding of hydroclimate variability. In particular, the comparison of the two sources of information is critical for addressing the uncertainties and limitations of both while enriching each of their interpretations. We review the principal proxy data available for hydroclimatic reconstructions over the CE and highlight the contemporary understanding of how these proxies are interpreted as hydroclimate indicators. We also review the available last-millennium simulations from fully coupled climate models and discuss several outstanding challenges associated with simulating hydroclimate variability and change over the CE. A specific review of simulated hydroclimatic changes forced by volcanic events is provided, as is a discussion of expected improvements in estimated radiative forcings, models, and their implementation in the future. Our review of hydroclimatic proxies and last-millennium model simulations is used as the basis for articulating a variety of considerations and best practices for how to perform proxy–model comparisons of CE hydroclimate. This discussion provides a framework for how best to evaluate hydroclimate variability and its associated dynamics using these comparisons and how they can better inform interpretations of both proxy data and model simulations. We subsequently explore means of using proxy–model comparisons to better constrain and characterize future hydroclimate risks. This is explored specifically in the context of several examples that demonstrate how proxy–model comparisons can be used to quantitatively constrain future hydroclimatic risks as estimated from climate model projections.
Climatic changes
Environmental sciences
Paleoclimatology--Mathematical models
Publisher DOI:
Item views
text | xml
Suggested Citation:
Jason E. Smerdon, Benjamin I. Cook, Justin S. Mankin, Deepti Singh, Nathan J. Steiger, Laia Andreu Hayles, Seung Hun Baek, Brendan M. Buckley, Edward R. Cook, Rosanne Dorothy D’Arrigo, Yochanan Kushnir, Caroline Wogan Leland, Mukund Palat Rao, Jacob S. Scheff, Richard Seager, A. Park Williams, PAGES Hydro2k Consortium, , Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era, Columbia University Academic Commons, .

Columbia University Libraries | Policies | FAQ