Watchdog or Lapdog: Limits of African Media Coverage of the Extractive Sector

James Christian Canonge; Matthew Purcell; Michael Behrman

Watchdog or Lapdog: Limits of African Media Coverage of the Extractive Sector
Canonge, James Christian
Purcell, Matthew
Behrman, Michael
Initiative for Policy Dialogue
Persistent URL:
School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University
Publisher Location:
New York
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of African media coverage of the extractive industries. This sector plays prominently on the African political, economic, social and journalistic landscape, yet coverage of these industries remains a challenge for African journalists. The financial and technical aspects of the extractive sector are complex, and both governments and companies often have a vested interest in withholding information from journalists. Many reporters lack sufficient training, resources and/or journalistic freedom to publish accurate, well‐researched, in‐depth coverage. As a result, what are arguably some of the most critical industries on the continent operate in relative freedom from public scrutiny. By making a careful study of African media coverage of the extractive sector in three countries, this report hopes to identify key strengths and weaknesses in extractive industry reporting as well as opportunities for media support and the expansion or revision of current media training efforts. The discovery of oil in Uganda in 2006 and in Ghana in 2007 brought both a great deal of excitement and a considerable level of worry to these countries. While extractive resources (oil, gas and mining) are a leading source of wealth for many African countries, this wealth often leads to corruption and conflict. In fact, countries with abundant natural resources tend to fall below less resource‐wealthy countries in terms of human development, a paradox economist Richard Auty and subsequent researchers have labeled the "resource curse." This report is based on two premises: first, that if Africans are to benefit from the immense resource stores that lie beneath their soil, great efforts must be made toward transparency in how these resources are handled. Second, the call for transparency cannot come from non‐governmental organizations and individual political leaders alone. The African media have a critical responsibility to push toward government and corporate openness in the extractive industries. African media have made great strides since the latter half of the twentieth century, but they continue to struggle to fulfill their role as society's watchdog. Instead of keeping governments in check through enterprising stories or investigative pieces, most African media have instead been leashed by a confluence of factors. Lack of resources, government intimidation and interference, media ownership, revenue structures and declining educational quality all make the job of the African journalist difficult. To mitigate some of these constraints, local and international non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), media outlets and in some cases government agencies are training journalists to more fully understand the intricacies of the areas that they cover.
Item views
text | xml
Suggested Citation:
James Christian Canonge, Matthew Purcell, Michael Behrman, , Watchdog or Lapdog: Limits of African Media Coverage of the Extractive Sector, Columbia University Academic Commons, .

Columbia University Libraries | Policies | FAQ