Home

Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparison

Andrew E. Gelman; Jennifer Hill; Masanao Yajima

Title:
Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparison
Author(s):
Gelman, Andrew E.
Hill, Jennifer
Yajima, Masanao
Date:
Type:
Working papers
Department:
Columbia Population Research Center
Permanent URL:
Series:
Columbia Population Research Center Working Papers
Part Number:
09-12
Publisher:
Columbia Population Research Center
Publisher Location:
New York
Abstract:
Applied researchers often find themselves making statistical inferences in settings that would seem to require multiple comparisons adjustments. We challenge the Type I error paradigm that underlies these corrections. Moreover we posit that the problem of multiple comparisons can disappear entirely when viewed from a hierarchical Bayesian perspective. We propose building multilevel models in the settings where multiple comparisons arise. Multilevel models perform partial pooling (shifting estimates toward each other), whereas classical procedures typically keep the centers of intervals stationary, adjusting for multiple comparisons by making the intervals wider (or, equivalently, adjusting the p-values corresponding to intervals of fixed width). Thus, multilevel models address the multiple comparisons problem and also yield more efficient estimates, especially in settings with low group-level variation, which is where multiple comparisons are a particular concern.
Subject(s):
Statistics
Item views:
218
Metadata:
View

In Partnership with the Center for Digital Research and Scholarship at Columbia University Libraries/Information Services.