Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust

Thomas A. DiPrete; Tyler McCormick; Andrew E. Gelman; Julien O. Teitler; Tian Zheng

Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust
DiPrete, Thomas A.
McCormick, Tyler
Gelman, Andrew E.
Teitler, Julien O.
Zheng, Tian
Working papers
Political Science, Sociology, Statistics, Columbia Population Research Center, Social Work
Permanent URL:
Columbia Population Research Center Working Papers
Part Number:
The published version of this paper is available at http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:15339
Using recently collected data from the 2006 General Social Survey, we compare levels of segregation by race and along other dimensions of potential social cleavage in the contemporary United States. Americans are not as isolated as other recent evidence suggests. However, hopes that "bridging" social capital is more common in broader acquaintanceship networks than in core networks are not supported by the GSS data. Instead, the entire acquaintanceship network appears to be as segregated as the more restricted and much smaller network based on trust. Social divisions based on religiosity, political ideology, family behaviors and socioeconomic standing are high and in some cases rival racial segregation in their intensity. The major challenge to social integration today comes less from the risk of social isolation--complete isolation is rare--than from the tendency of many Americans to isolate themselves from others who differ on race, political ideology, level of religiosity, and other salient aspects of social identity.
Social structure
Item views:
text | xml
Suggested Citation:
Thomas A. DiPrete, Tyler McCormick, Andrew E. Gelman, Julien O. Teitler, Tian Zheng, 2009, Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust, Columbia University Academic Commons, http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:9792.

In Partnership with the Center for Digital Research and Scholarship at Columbia University Libraries | Terms of Use | Copyright