1. Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparisons Gelman, Andrew E.; Hill, Jennifer; Yajima, Masanao 2009 Articles StatisticsBayesian statistical decision theoryMultilevel models (Statistics)Statistical hypothesis testing
2. When Does Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Give a Correct Decomposition into Parts? Donoho, David L.; Stodden, Victoria C. 2004 Articles Statistics
3. What will we know on Tuesday at 7pm? Gelman, Andrew E.; Silver, Nate 2008 Articles Political scienceStatistics
4. What does "Do campaigns matter?" mean? Bafumi, Joseph; Gelman, Andrew E.; Park, David K. 2004 Articles Political scienceStatisticsPresidents--Election
5. Using individual growth model to analyze the change in quality of life from adolescence to adulthood Chen, Henian; Cohen, Patricia R. 2006 Articles Human growth--Mathematical modelsQuality of life--Statistical methodsYoung adults--Health and hygieneMedical sciencesAgingStatistics
6. Thoughts on new statistical procedures for age-period-cohort analyses Gelman, Andrew E. 2008 Articles Statistics
7. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: 1995-2010 Some Descriptive Statistics Mavroidis, Petros C.; Horn, Henrik; Johannesson, Louise 2011 Articles Dispute resolution (Law)StatisticsDeveloped countriesDeveloping countriesLawInternational lawWorld Trade OrganizationEuropean Union
8. The Representation of Social Processes by Markov Models Singer, Burton; Spilerman, Seymour 1976 Articles SociologyStatistics
9. The Prior Can Often Only Be Understood in the Context of the Likelihood Gelman, Andrew E.; Simpson, Daniel; Betancourt, Michael Joseph 2017 Articles Bayesian statistical decision theoryDistribution (Probability theory)Statistics
10. The playing field shifts: Predicting the seats-votes curve in the 2008 U.S. House election Kastellec, Jonathan P.; Gelman, Andrew E.; Chandler, Jamie P. 2008 Articles Political scienceMathematical statisticsStatistics