Related to your search
Columbia FDI Perspectives
See all series content
Columbia FDI Perspectives is an occasional series of perspectives on important and topical foreign direct investment issues. http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives/
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment
See all partner content
The Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), a joint center of Columbia Law School and Columbia Climate School at Columbia University, is the only university-based applied research center and forum dedicated to the study, practice, and discussion of sustainable international investment. It develops practical approaches for governments, investors, communities, and other stakeholders to maximize the benefits of international investment for sustainable development. Applying its legal, economic, and policy expertise, CCSI addresses sustainable investment holistically, bridging investment law, natural resource management, human rights, economics, political economy, and environmental management. It works to strengthen the sustainable development potential of international investment, and to ensure that international investment is mutually beneficial for investors and the citizens of recipient countries. http://ccsi.columbia.edu/
Search Results
52. 从出口加工到知识处理:升级FDI促进工具
53. 俄罗的FDI进入艰难时期
54. 中国对欧FDI:从可再生能源领域学到的经验
55. 吸引并受益于FDI:印度能够赶超中国吗?
56. 消除特殊目的实体对 FDI 的影响
57. FDI利润的增长及其对发展中国家收支平衡的影响
58. 取消吸引FDI的激励措施:东道国能否把魔鬼放进瓶子?
59. 基础设施在吸引FDI方面的关键作用
60. Facilitating investment for sustainable development: it matters for Africa
61. Democracies conclude more and stricter international investment agreements – but why?
62. Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Forward toward incentivization
63. Chinese FDI in the EU: learning from the renewable energy sector
64. China’s “new normal” in international investment agreements
65. China needs to complement its “going-out” policy with a “going-in” strategy
66. Changing geography: prospects for Asian actors as global rule-makers in international investment law
67. ChAFTA新制度:利用条约缔约方联合控制以保障公共福利规制
68. Can India emulate China in attracting and benefitting from FDI?
69. Can host countries have legitimate expectations?
70. Canada’s non-reciprocal BIT with China: Would the US or Europe do the same?
71. Bringing the state back in: India’s 2015 model BIT
72. Brazil’s bilateral investment treaties: More than a new investment treaty model?
73. 如何分析双边投资协定(BITs)对FDI的影响?
74. 中国-欧盟BIT:形成中的“全球BIT2.0”?
75. 中加非互惠性BIT协定:美欧是否效仿?
76. A stronger role for the European Parliament in the design of the EU’s investment policy as a legitimacy safeguard
77. A reading of intra-EU BITs in light of recent developments of EU law
78. An outline for systematic reform of the investment law regime
79. A new foreign direct investment accounting methodology for economic development organizations
80. An appellate body for international investment disputes: How appealing is it?
81. 聚焦印度2015年双边投资条约
82. 中国-加拿大双边投资协定(2012):展望和启示
83. 多边机构内的单点投资争端解决:联合国国际贸易法委员会的前景如何?
84. 泛非投资准则:迈出了良好的第一步,但尚需进一步的行动
85. 欧盟投资法庭:前进道路上的挑战
86. 便利化与可持续发展投资:对非洲至关重要
87. 投资便利化议程的未来发展
88. 投资便利化:一个新兴议题
89. 作为合法性保障的欧洲议会应当在欧盟投资政策的制定过程中发挥更大的作用
90. 东道国能否拥有合法预期?
91. 为何发达国家企业更青睐中国收购者
92. 国际投资协定中基于安全利益单边裁决条款的兴起
93. “透明度”的另一面
94. 建立国际投资争端上诉机构:有多大吸引力?
95. 国家—投资者争端解决机制何时适合于解决投资争端? ——关于“法治评级机制”的构想
96. 外商撤资:跨国公司离开后将会留下什么?
97. 采矿业国际监管的协调问题
98. 巴西的双边投资条约:不仅仅是一种新的投资协议模式?
99. 投资条约法、可持续发展和负责任的商业行为: 一个实情调查
100. 利用投资者—国家争端解决机制加强投资者义务
- « Previous
- Next »
- 1
- 2
- 3