WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:01.040 --> 00:00:06.560
My name is Michel Boufadel. I'm the PI&nbsp;
and Dr. Xiaolong (Leo) Geng is Co-PI.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:07.920 --> 00:00:15.040
We collaborated with various researchers in the&nbsp;
nation. You can see their list here at Princeton,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:15.040 --> 00:00:19.360
Duke, Rutgers, Hopkins, University of&nbsp;
Pittsburgh, and the University of Cincinnati.

00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:27.200
The first part of the talk is going to&nbsp;
focus on the number of cases in the U.S. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:28.080 --> 00:00:34.320
you obtain these data from Johns Hopkins&nbsp;
University and you know they provided&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:39.920
them daily. And then so we analyzed the special&nbsp;
distribution of the number of cases and then you&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:47.360
can see here in March 2020 and then in May. And&nbsp;
then like if you zoom in on the certain region,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:47.360 --> 00:00:52.880
let's say this is the Washington D.C. area, we&nbsp;
noticed that the number of observed cases you&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:52.880 --> 00:00:58.480
know they are spiky. So, you have like the high&nbsp;
number, maybe this is D.C. or Baltimore, and&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:58.480 --> 00:01:04.000
then you move and then there's nothing in between.&nbsp;
You do the smaller population and then you have a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:09.840
higher number. So, for us that's reminiscent&nbsp;
of what's observed in, you know, in turbulence&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:10.560 --> 00:01:16.720
and then so we thought okay that the number of&nbsp;
cases would be something known as multifractal.

00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:26.400
And so, we, you know, we got to investigate that.&nbsp;
So, the conclusion is that the number of COVID-19&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:34.320
cases is what you call scaling, and then, but&nbsp;
it's not totally random. It is correlated and&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:40.320
we analyze the correlation using what we call the&nbsp;
Fourier spectrum. So first because it is scaling,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:40.320 --> 00:01:47.360
so the- you can find a direct relation between&nbsp;
what's happening at 10 kilometers up to 2,600&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:47.360 --> 00:01:55.360
kilometers. So initially, during the early phase&nbsp;
of the disease, the correlation was small you&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:55.360 --> 00:02:01.760
know- as you can- as one could deduce from the&nbsp;
slope. As the slope gets, you know, steeper, then&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:06.960
it means the correlation increases and then we&nbsp;
notice that the spatial correlation of the disease&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:06.960 --> 00:02:13.760
converges towards the correlation- the spatial&nbsp;
correlation of the population. And these are other&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:13.760 --> 00:02:18.720
multi-factor properties that you know- they are&nbsp;
in the paper. I'm not going to discuss them now.

00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:23.360
And then for our investigation, we used a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:28.080
relatively simple model developed,&nbsp;
you know, more than 120 years ago.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:33.840
It is called SIR model. Susceptible these are the&nbsp;
people who could be infected- the infected ones,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:33.840 --> 00:02:39.360
infectious and then removed. These could&nbsp;
be removed due to recover or by death.

00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:48.160
So, we are- we use this model to try to capture&nbsp;
what is happening and you know if you recall that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:48.160 --> 00:02:54.960
spectral slope figure, this is here shown as a&nbsp;
time series using also our model which is the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:54.960 --> 00:03:01.680
line. And then one could note that we were able to&nbsp;
produce the spatial correlation using that model.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:09.040
This is just an illustration of how our model&nbsp;
functions. So, we start with a population that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:16.320
is multifractal and then we assign, you know,&nbsp;
the model for infection and then you can see&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:16.320 --> 00:03:21.440
these are the number of new cases of course with&nbsp;
time- the number of new cases with the subsides.

00:03:22.880 --> 00:03:27.440
The conclusion of this is that,&nbsp;
you know- the first thing was&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:27.440 --> 00:03:32.080
the major finding for us was the population-&nbsp;
the special distribution of population&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:32.080 --> 00:03:39.440
is multifractal, so which allows us to explain why&nbsp;
the COVID-19 spatial distribution is multifractal.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:41.040 --> 00:03:46.720
You know, there are major work where they use&nbsp;
big data to model the spread of the disease&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:46.720 --> 00:03:52.640
using number of people, using their phones, so&nbsp;
our approach, you know, provide a compromise&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:52.640 --> 00:03:59.360
between the big approach- the big data approach&nbsp;
and, you know, fitting models at small towns say&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:59.360 --> 00:04:05.200
at the scale, say, of Newark. And there's&nbsp;
always issues of privacy using big data.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:11.600
And the other, you know, again this is&nbsp;
maybe pure modeling but we believe that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:11.600 --> 00:04:15.760
paying attention to special correlation would&nbsp;
constrain the model so it doesn't go wild.

00:04:17.520 --> 00:04:23.920
The next part of my talk is about the movement&nbsp;
of virion you know or you know just call them&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:23.920 --> 00:04:29.040
particles in the supermarket. Imagine this is&nbsp;
a supermarket that is 40 meters long, you know,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:29.040 --> 00:04:37.920
20-25 meter wide. And then you have the doors&nbsp;
here. The red in the arrows these are the- where&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:37.920 --> 00:04:43.600
the air comes from- vents. And then the white&nbsp;
arrows are the return vents. This is hypothetical.

00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:48.000
And so, we use CFD [Computational&nbsp;
Fluid Dynamics] simulation, we call&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:52.160
it RANS, to model the movement&nbsp;
of air in the supermarket.

00:04:52.160 --> 00:04:57.840
And I want to show here the results. Our focus was&nbsp;
on the attachment of the particles. There are a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:57.840 --> 00:05:03.280
lot of studies that deal with the transport, but&nbsp;
for us we say, okay, you know, what happened? You&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:03.280 --> 00:05:09.040
know because we do know that the part you know the&nbsp;
virus or the particles they do attach to surfaces.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:09.600 --> 00:05:14.640
So here you can see them attaching to the ceiling&nbsp;
the orange. They attached to shelves you know&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:14.640 --> 00:05:20.000
blue, attached on the floor which is yellow.&nbsp;
Whereas if you don't allow for attachment,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:24.560
you know even after 20 minutes you see them&nbsp;
spread all over the place. So therefore,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:30.400
the attachment on services is important when you&nbsp;
want to predict the indoor transport of viruses.

00:05:32.160 --> 00:05:38.640
This is one curve here where you have&nbsp;
one graph. You have the concentration&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:39.200 --> 00:05:45.040
at 5 meters from the source. This is&nbsp;
without attachment of 5-micron droplets,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:45.040 --> 00:05:51.600
so it is 20 percent the strength of&nbsp;
the source. With 25 percent attachment,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:51.600 --> 00:05:57.920
you can see this is like maybe 12 percent and then&nbsp;
with 100 percent attachment is like 10 percent.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:57.920 --> 00:06:03.520
So, we conclude that the attachment doesn't&nbsp;
play a role which means the type of surfaces&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:03.520 --> 00:06:08.320
in the supermarket is not going to be-&nbsp;
it's not going to play a major role&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:08.320 --> 00:06:13.600
because there were discussions like oh should&nbsp;
we use you know metal or glass or plastic?&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:13.600 --> 00:06:17.200
We- based on these simulations, it&nbsp;
seems it doesn't make a big difference.

00:06:20.080 --> 00:06:24.800
One thing we investigated is also, you know,&nbsp;
when they said, okay, there's one way in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:30.480
supermarket so people could walk one way- one-way&nbsp;
isles. And then we said okay well one of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:30.480 --> 00:06:36.400
things that you could reduce you know the number&nbsp;
of air particles the virus particles in the air,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:37.200 --> 00:06:41.760
is maybe you can create "Baffles". This is- as&nbsp;
an environmental engineer we're used to using-&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:41.760 --> 00:06:47.840
to this concept for plug flow reactors. And&nbsp;
then we conclude that if you place these&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:48.640 --> 00:06:55.360
baffles in the system, you are going to reduce&nbsp;
the concentration of particles in the air. And&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:57.680 --> 00:07:03.680
the other thing that- from the study is that the&nbsp;
narrower the aisles, the better the air quality,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:07.920
which is kind of counterintuitive because every-&nbsp;
you know whenever you look at a supermarket you&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:15.200
know you look at large aisles and then it gives&nbsp;
you the feeling that it is healthier. Thank you.

