Comparing Speed of Provider Data Entry: Electronic Versus Paper Methods
- Comparing Speed of Provider Data Entry: Electronic Versus Paper Methods
- Jackson, Kevin M.
Kaiser, Gail E.
Chiang, Michael F.
- Computer Science
- Persistent URL:
- Columbia University Computer Science Technical Reports
- Part Number:
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University
- Publisher Location:
- New York
- Electronic health record (EHR) systems have significant potential advantages over traditional paper-based systems, but they require that providers assume responsibility for data entry. One significant barrier to adoption of EHRs is the perception of slowed data-entry by providers. This study compares the speed of data-entry using computer-based templates vs. paper for a large eye clinic, using 10 subjects and 10 simulated clinical scenarios. Dataentry into the EHR was significantly slower (p<0.01) than traditional paper forms.
- Computer science
- Item views
text | xml
- Suggested Citation:
- Kevin M. Jackson, Gail E. Kaiser, Lyndon Wong, Daniel Rabinowitz, Michael F. Chiang, 2010, Comparing Speed of Provider Data Entry: Electronic Versus Paper Methods, Columbia University Academic Commons, https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K07C5R.