
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Who should abate carbon emission?</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal" ID="gc9">
        <namePart type="family">Chichilnisky</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Graciela</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Columbia University. Economics</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="personal" ID="gmh1">
        <namePart type="family">Heal</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Geoffrey M.</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Columbia University. Business</affiliation>
        <affiliation>Columbia University. Earth Institute</affiliation>
        <affiliation>Columbia University. International and Public Affairs</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Columbia University. Economics</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">contributor</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre>Working papers</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <place>
            <placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm>
        </place>
        <publisher>Department of Economics, Columbia University</publisher>
        <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf" keyDate="yes">1993</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <abstract>We review the optimal pattern of carbon emission abatements across countries in a simple multi-country world. We model explicitly (with the model in Chichilnisky [4]) the fact that the atmosphere is a public good. Within this framework we establish conditions for it to be necessary for optimality that the marginal cost of abatement be the same in all countries. These condition are quite restrictive, and amount to either ignoring distributional issues between countries or operating within a framework within which lump-sum transfers can be made between countries. These results have implications for the use of tradeable emission permits, which as normally advocated will lead to the equalization of marginal abatement costs across countries. The observation that the atmosphere is a public good implies that we may need to look at a Lindahl equilibrium in tradeable permits.</abstract>
    <subject>
        <topic>Economics</topic>
    </subject>
    <relatedItem type="series" ID="r.1">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Department of Economics Discussion Papers</title>
            <partNumber>683</partNumber>
        </titleInfo>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:15575</identifier>

    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>
        <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-02-25 09:43:47 -0500</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-08-04 14:08:45 -0400</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>2768</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
