
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Race as a Legal Concept</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="family">Desautels-Stein</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Justin</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Columbia University. Law</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre>Articles</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf" keyDate="yes">2012</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    
    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <abstract>Race is a legal concept, and like all legal concepts, it is a matrix of rules. Although the legal conception of race has shifted over time, up from slavery and to the present, one element in the matrix has remained the same: the background rules of race have always taken a view of racial identity as a natural aspect of human biology. To be sure, characterizations of the rule have oftentimes kept pace with developments in race science, and the original invention of race as a rationale for the subordination of certain human populations is now a rationale with little currency. The departure from this &quot;classic liberal&quot; conception of race, and its attendant and disturbing view of the function of race, did not, however, depart from the idea that race is a natural and organic part of being a human being. As this Article argues, this seminal background rule—that race is natural, neutral, and necessary—is deeply problematic and a substantial obstacle in the fight against the Supreme Court&apos;s ascending anticlassification jurisprudence. Not to mention, it is also false. In an effort to make some headway against the idea that race is a natural idea, as opposed to a legal concept, the Article attacks the background rules of race via the unlikely field of Conflict of Laws. Taking the Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 as a benchmark, the discussion first suggests an early functionalist view of voluntary school integration by way of an analogy to the early twentieth-century transformations occurring in Conflicts of Laws. Second, and in the alternative, the discussion then situates the facts of Parents Involved as literally a problem of Conflict of Laws. In both instances, the hope is to focus legal discourse on the background rules of race so as to empower a new and emancipatory anti-subordination jurisprudence.</abstract>
    <subject>
        <topic>Law</topic>
    </subject>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Columbia Journal of Race and Law</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <part>
            <detail type="volume">
                <number>2</number>
            </detail>
            <detail type="issue">
                <number>1</number>
            </detail>
            <extent unit="page">
                <start>1</start>
                <end>74</end>
            </extent>
            <date>2012</date>
        </part>
        <identifier type="issn">2155-2401</identifier>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:15021</identifier>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>
        <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-20 01:12:17 -0400</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-22 16:22:29 -0400</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>9025</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
