
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Racial Profiling Legalized in Arizona</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="family">Cohn</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Marjorie</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Columbia University. Law</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre>Articles</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf" keyDate="yes">2012</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    
    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <abstract>In 2010, Arizona enacted S.B. 1070, which, by its very terms, necessitates racial profiling. The definition of racial profiling is &quot;the reliance on race, skin color and/or ethnicity as an indication of criminality, reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, except when part of a description of a suspect, and said description is timely, reliable, and geographically relevant.&quot; Although the new statute says that law enforcement officers &quot;may not consider race, color or national origin in the enforcement of this section,&quot; that language is followed by the words, &quot;except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona Constitution.&quot; Indeed, S.B. 1070 effectively requires the consideration of race, color and national origin because it is unfathomable how a law enforcement official could avoid considering those factors in deciding whom to investigate under the new law. Even the most well-meaning officer cannot possibly determine whether an individual may be undocumented without making judgments based on apparent race, color and national origin.</abstract>
    <subject>
        <topic>Law</topic>
    </subject>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Columbia Journal of Race and Law</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <part>
            <detail type="volume">
                <number>1</number>
            </detail>
            <detail type="issue">
                <number>2</number>
            </detail>
            <extent unit="page">
                <start>168</start>
                <end>186</end>
            </extent>
            <date>2012-04</date>
        </part>
        <identifier type="issn">2155-2401</identifier>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:15002</identifier>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>
        <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-20 00:20:00 -0400</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-22 10:18:25 -0400</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>9006</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
