
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Assessing Developmental Assessment in Community Colleges</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal" ID="kh154">
        <namePart type="family">Hughes</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Katherine Lee</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Teachers College. Institute on Education and the Economy</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="personal" ID="js3676">
        <namePart type="family">Scott-Clayton</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Judith E.</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Teachers College. International and Transcultural Studies</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Teachers College. Community College Research Center</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre>Working papers</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <place>
            <placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm>
        </place>
        <publisher>Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University</publisher>
        <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf" keyDate="yes">2011</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <abstract>Placement exams are high-stakes assessments that determine many students&apos; college trajectories. The majority of community colleges use placement exams—most often the ACCUPLACER, developed by the College Board, or the COMPASS, developed by ACT, Inc.—to sort students into college-level or developmental education courses in math, reading, and sometimes writing. More than half of entering students at community colleges are placed into developmental education in at least one subject as a result. But the evidence on the predictive validity of these tests is not as strong as many might assume, given the stakes involved—and recent research fails to find evidence that the resulting placements into remediation improve student outcomes. While this has spurred debate about the content and delivery of remedial coursework, it is possible that the assessment process itself may be broken; the debate about remediation policy is incomplete without a fuller understanding of the role of assessment. This paper examines the extent of consensus regarding the role of developmental assessment and how it is best implemented, the validity of the most common assessments currently in use, and emerging directions in assessment policy and practice. Alternative methods of assessment—particularly those involving multiple measures of student preparedness—seem to have the potential to improve student outcomes, but more research is needed to determine what type of change in assessment and placement policy might improve persistence and graduation rates. The paper concludes with a discussion of gaps in the literature and implications for policy and research.</abstract>
    <note>http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/</note>
    <subject>
        <topic>Community college education</topic>
    </subject>
    <subject>
        <topic>Educational tests and measurements</topic>
    </subject>
    <relatedItem type="series" ID="r.1">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>CCRC Working Paper (Assessment of Evidence Series)</title>
            <partNumber>19</partNumber>
        </titleInfo>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:13143</identifier>

    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>      
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-04 15:45:14 -0400</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-04 15:49:23 -0400</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>7146</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
