
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Measuring Efficiency in the Community College Sector</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal" ID="cb2505">
        <namePart type="family">Belfield</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Clive</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Teachers College. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Teachers College. Community College Research Center</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre>Working papers</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <place>
            <placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm>
        </place>
        <publisher>Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University</publisher>
        <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf" keyDate="yes">2012</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <abstract>Community colleges are increasingly being pressed to demonstrate efficiency and improve productivity even as these concepts are not clearly defined and require a significant set of assumptions to determine. This paper sets out a preferred economic definition of efficiency: fiscal and social cost per degree. It then assesses the validity of using IPEDS data to calculate efficiency for the community college system. Using IPEDS, I estimate the fiscal cost per associate degree at $52,900 for comprehensive community colleges and $42,740 for vocational colleges (in 2008 dollars); the social costs per degree are $71,610 and $56,930, respectively. The community college sector has become more efficient over time: fiscal and social costs per degree are lower in real terms in 2008 than they were in 1987. However, two issues are important to the validity of IPEDS: the ability to adjust for differences in student ability and the way that transfer patterns are incorporated. This paper addresses both of them.</abstract>
    <note>http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/</note>
    <subject>
        <topic>Community college education</topic>
    </subject>
    <relatedItem type="series" ID="r.1">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>CCRC Working Paper</title>
            <partNumber>43</partNumber>
        </titleInfo>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:13087</identifier>

    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>
        <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-02 12:54:16 -0400</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-02 12:56:15 -0400</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>7092</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
