
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Subjectivity and Selfhood in Kant, Fichte and Heidegger</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal" ID="mrs2117">
        <namePart type="family">Stevenson</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Michael</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Columbia University. Philosophy</affiliation>
        <affiliation>Barnard College. Philosophy (Barnard College)</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="personal" ID="fwn7">
        <namePart type="family">Neuhouser</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Frederick</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">thesis advisor</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Barnard College. Philosophy (Barnard College)</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Columbia University. Philosophy</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    
    <genre>Dissertations</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued keyDate="yes">2012</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    
    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <abstract>Kant once said that the &quot;whole field of philosophy&quot; is guided by the fundamental question, &quot;What is the human being?&quot;  Kant himself, and even more so his Idealist successors, addressed this question by offering transcendental theories of human subjectivity. My dissertation explores the philosophical development of the Kantian and post-Kantian theories of subjectivity and their relationship to the often neglected theory of selfhood in Heidegger&apos;s Being and Time. After examining the issues in Kant&apos;s theory which were decisive motivating factors for the post-Kantian Idealists--namely the metaphysical status of the apperceptive I and the unity of reason--I explore Fichte&apos;s metaphysics of subjectivity and his attempt to demonstrate the unity and self-sufficiency of reason. Finally, I argue that the early Heidegger&apos;s theory of finite human existence is best understood as an extension of and corrective to the classical Idealist tradition. I attempt to cash out two of Heidegger&apos;s claims: (1) that his own &quot;fundamental ontology&quot; is pre-figured by Kant&apos;s theory of subjectivity, and (2) that the crucial insights in his reading of Kant share much with the Idealists but also &quot;move in the opposite direction&quot; from them. I argue that Heidegger&apos;s theory of selfhood gives an account of the sui generis features of human existence which unifies our theoretical and practical activities while avoiding the stronger Idealist claims regarding the self-sufficiency and self-legitimacy of reason.</abstract>
    <note>Ph.D., Columbia University.</note>
    <subject>
        <topic>Philosophy</topic>
    </subject>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:12604</identifier>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>
        <recordCreationDate>2012-02-17 12:59:44 -0500</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate>2012-02-17 13:07:42 -0500</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>6609</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
