
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-4.xsd">
    
    <titleInfo>
        <title>The rise and fall of early oil field technology: The torsion balance gradiometer</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal" ID="reb4">
        <namePart type="family">Bell</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Robin E.</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
        <affiliation>Columbia University. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="family">Hansen</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">R. O.</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
        <namePart>Columbia University. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm type="text">originator</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre>Articles</genre>
    
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf" keyDate="yes">1998</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    
    <language>
        <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <abstract>Today elementary physics students take for granted such quantities as &quot;big G,&quot; the universal gravitational constant. In fact in the late 1700s the value of this quantity was unknown, and the quest to determine it led to some of the earliest geophysical instrumentation. Just after the Revolutionary War in the United States, Cavendish developed the first system to measure the universal gravitational constant, the familiar &quot;big G.&quot; Unfortunately, for geologists (at this time still mostly &quot;gentlemen scientists&quot;), this apparatus produced data which were difficult to interpret geologically, and it was far too large and cumbersome for field use. The geologic limitation was that the system only measured the horizontal derivative of a horizontal component of the gravity field, a quantity which by itself is difficult to interpret. Thus no applications of this elegant yet laboratory-bound instrument emerged.</abstract>
    <subject>
        <topic>Geology</topic>
    </subject>
    <subject>
        <topic>Geophysics</topic>
    </subject>
    <subject>
        <topic>Petrology</topic>
    </subject>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Leading Edge</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <part>
            <detail type="volume">
                <number>17</number>
            </detail>
            <detail type="issue">
                <number>1</number>
            </detail>
            <extent unit="page">
                <start>81</start>
                <start>83</start>
            </extent>
            <date>1998-01</date>
        </part>
        <identifier type="doi">10.1190/1.1437836</identifier>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:12547</identifier>
    
    <location>
        <physicalLocation authority="marcorg">NNC</physicalLocation>
    </location>
    
    <recordInfo>
        <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">NNC</recordContentSource>
        <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02-13 15:40:03 -0500</recordCreationDate>
        <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02-16 10:25:39 -0500</recordChangeDate>
        <recordIdentifier>6552</recordIdentifier>
        <languageOfCataloging>
            <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    
</mods>
