Home

Arsenic in tube well water in Bangladesh: health and economic impacts and implications for arsenic mitigation

Sara V. Flanagan; Richard B. Johnston; Yan Zheng

Title:
Arsenic in tube well water in Bangladesh: health and economic impacts and implications for arsenic mitigation
Author(s):
Flanagan, Sara V.
Johnston, Richard B.
Zheng, Yan
Date:
Type:
Articles
Department:
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Volume:
90
Permanent URL:
Book/Journal Title:
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Abstract:
A national drinking water quality survey conducted in 2009 furnished data that were used to make an updated estimate of chronic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. About 20 million and 45 million people were found to be exposed to concentrations above the national standard of 50 μg/L and the World Health Organization’s guideline value of 10 μg/L, respectively. From the updated exposure data and all-cause mortality hazard ratios based on local epidemiological studies, it was estimated that arsenic exposures to concentrations > 50 μg/L and 10–50 μg/L account for an annual 24 000 and perhaps as many as 19 000 adult deaths in the country, respectively. Exposure varies widely in the 64 districts; among adults, arsenic-related deaths account for 0–15% of all deaths. An arsenic-related mortality rate of 1 in every 18 adult deaths could represent an economic burden of 13 billion United States dollars (US$) in lost productivity alone over the next 20 years. Arsenic mitigation should follow a two-tiered approach: (i) prioritizing provision of safe water to an estimated 5 million people exposed to > 200 μg/L arsenic, and (ii) building local arsenic testing capacity. The effectiveness of such an approach was demonstrated during the United Nations Children’s Fund 2006–2011 country programme, which provided safe water to arsenic-contaminated areas at a cost of US$ 11 per capita. National scale-up of such an approach would cost a few hundred million US dollars but would improve the health and productivity of the population, especially in future generations.
Subject(s):
Public health
Environmental science
Publisher DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.101253
Item views:
123
Metadata:
text | xml

In Partnership with the Center for Digital Research and Scholarship at Columbia University Libraries/Information Services | Terms of Use